Quantcast

Balmoral & Broadway – cross at your own risk

Tuesday, August 30, 2011
By Jeremy Bressman

Balmoral & Broadway. Credit: Jeremy Bressman

Crossing the street at Balmoral and Broadway can sometimes be more difficult than a game of Frogger.  Four lanes of traffic travel (usually speeding) north/south on Broadway, eastbound traffic on Balmoral approaching Broadway from the west has the option of turning right, left or cross straight across those four lanes on Broadway, traffic travels both east and westbound on Balmoral east of Broadway, and pedestrians cross in all four directions of the street.  Essentially, whether you are driving or walking you have a confusing mess of a recipe for disaster. Rarely do cars stop, yet alone slow down for a pedestrian in any of the cross walks.

With Broman Playlot children’s park, a popular pet store and a new neighborhood pub occupying three of the four corners and attracting pedestrians to this intersection, it is obvious some sort of traffic calming is much needed. Already two pedestrians have been struck at this intersection in the past few years that we know of;  just this weekend on Satuday a pedestrian was struck here and had to be taken away by paramedics.  Fortunately, injuries do not appear to be too severe. 

Brendan Costello, co-owner of Burke’s Public House (5401 N Broadway), supports a stop light being installed at the intersection.  Like many in the area, he worries both about residents with children who live on the east side of Broadway trying to cross while heading west to Andersonville or the playlot, as well as residents who live west of Broadway who are coming to frequent his business, Jewel or the lakefront. 

Kate Welborn, President of the Lakewood Balmoral Residents Council acknowledges the intersection as being dangerous but is also sensative of the impact a stop light may have of driving additional traffic through the Lakewood Balmoral neighborhood.  “I am in favor of calming devices {at Balmoral and Broadway}, but have concerns about how a stop-sign or signal could affect traffic volume in the heart of our neighborhood. Drivers commonly disobey signage on Balmoral, and this problem may escalate if access to Broadway (north or south) is more convenient” Welborn says.

When asked if the 48th Ward office was aware of the dangers of this intersection, Dan Luna from the 48th Ward staff replied “Yes, in the future there will be a traffic signal or a traffic calming device at that intersection. A traffic study has already been requested. I couldn’t agree more that traffic needs to slow down on Broadway. I’m confident that a signal will be there within the next two years.”  Two years? 

When this issue was originally brought up to former Alderman Smith a few years back from the EBNA block club and others, she too told us a traffic study was requested and no further action was taken that we are aware of so we’re a bit pessimistic. We were able to garner the attention of the CPD in 2010, and they conducted a traffic sting here but that was nothing more than a temporary fix to the larger problem.  I do have more confidence in Osterman’s staff to eventually bring a permanent solution, but can’t help but wonder how many more pedestrians will be struck at this dangerous intersection over the next two years. In the interim, I suggest walking south to the light at Berwyn.

Tags: , , , , ,

  • K Bergan

    It’s on an even-numbered street, so it should technically be major-enough to merit a

  • Anonymous

    Traffic lights should have been installed at this intersection when Mary Ann Smith was alderman.  It is the only four-corner intersection on Broadway between Foster and Devon that does not have a traffic signal.  While I appreciate the concerns of LBRC about increased traffic on Balmoral, there are speed humps and stop signs on every block between Glenwood and Broadway.  Pedestrian safety is the most important, especially with the playlot at this corner.  How many more adults or children need to be injured before action is taken?  Harry Osterman should make this a priority and use some of his menu money to fund installation of the signal this year.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QVDONMKZAPS7JYV4FDOOSN6N5E big D

      MarkPalermo said: “How many more adults or children need to be injured before action is taken?”

      How many adults or children HAVE been injured at that intersection? And don’t throw out some made up #. If you can’t cite legitimite statistics, then don’t play that game.

      • Jeremy

        “How many adults or children HAVE been injured at that intersection?”
         
        At minimum, two.  A member of the EBNA block club was seriously injured about 2 years ago.  I believe he had to walk with a cane or walker after the incident but I am not familiar with all the details.  And, this weekend someone was taken away in an ambulence after being struck by a vehicle.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QVDONMKZAPS7JYV4FDOOSN6N5E big D

          Two pedestrians hit while crossing the street in two years.

          Yeah, that’s a real epidemic you’ve got there. *rolls eyes*

          • Josh C

            That is what the author is aware of.  I know there have been multiple car crashes as well.  I do know that one of the pedestrians struck (maybe one of the two the author mentions) was out of work for a full year because of this incident.  My guess is your opinion would be different than “rolling eyes” if this was you

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QVDONMKZAPS7JYV4FDOOSN6N5E big D

            I’m rolling my eyes at the hyperbole, not the incidents.

          • Cindykope

            I lived at Balmoral and Kenmore for over 20ys,To me.It’s not about how many people that have been hit ..It’s about how dangerous that intersection is ,not just for Pedestrians ,but also for Cars…I can’t even begin to tell you how many times i witnessed accidents that “ALMOST ” happened ,and SOME that did..Yes i get that accidents happen even when there is a Traffic  Light,but trust me it would make a HUGE difference for the better !!!!Btw ,i am primarily a Pedestrian,but also a Driver,and i support a Traffic light 100%..

    • Kris Klimek

      It almost appears by the comments that those who don’t want a stop sign/traffic light very rarely walk but rather hop in their car to go everywhere. IF they did walk more they would see the hazards that pedestrians face on a daily basis. Seniors, children, bicyclists, strollers, dog walkers, it’s a nightmare and wherever an improvement can be made for safety, then it should be done. This is not “Motor City”.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QVDONMKZAPS7JYV4FDOOSN6N5E big D

        There are other methods to traffic calming than installing a stop light every 2 blocks.

  • JVC

    I am absolutely against having another ridiculous traffic light on Broadway.  I’ve lived down the street from this intersection for 6 years and have never had a problem crossing.  Traffic in Chicago is a problem and the traffic backup on Broadway due to poorly timed and ill placed traffic lights is awful. Having a stop light at every intersection of Broadway not only is poor management of traffic and tax dollars, but also increases the amount of time cars are on the road leading to poor air quality and frustrated drivers. At the very most, a crosswalk could be placed, making it mandatory for cars to stop if a pedestrian is present.  If this intersection is such a problem, walk a block north or south to cross. 

    • Edgewater Steve

      A traffic light is absolutely necessary.  Two people have been struck – when the next one is struck and its fatal I think it will be very worth the dollars.  AND, I dont care about traffic – walk or take public transit rather than zipping down Broadway at 50 mph, THAT will improve air quality… Broadway has become a suburban boulevard.

    • Kris Klimek

      A “Crosswalk”? Are you kidding me? I could probably count on ONE hand how many times I actually see a car stop for pedestrians in a LEGAL crosswalk let alone one by a playground. If traffic is so bad where you drive, perhaps you could consider taking public transportation. The issue here is PEDESTRIAN safety, NOT motorists safety. Motorists are SUPPOSE to be looking out for PEDESTRIANS. Even when the light turns yellow or red, even when we have the “walk” sign, we still have to watch out for motorists who are not paying attention and blow through the lights. I can’t imagine what would happen to a child by a playground. That intersection needs a 4 way stop sign NOW….wonder if our Alderman is listening? 

  • Kris Klimek

    IMHO, where ever there is a playground or park, there SHOULD be a 4 way stop sign. Children run in all directions when they’re playing without looking. We have the same issue at Thorndale & Sheridan Rd with the George Lane playground. The speed limit is 35 on Sheridan but speeding is the norm on that road. When do our ELECTED politicians start actually listening to AND hearing their constituents? I tried to get a stop sign put up at that intersection through MAS, you see how that went. 

  • rhoda

    At a very minimum and as a quick, possibly faster-approved action, how about better visibility like this paint job of a crosswalk? http://i01.i.aliimg.com/photo/v0/103463985/Crosswalk_marking_paint.jpg  (BTW I am a carless pedestrian who walks that intersection to my petstore!)

    • Edgebpe

      If we go this lower cost route, there also needs to be a sign that says “stop – it’s the law”, just like the crosswalks on clark up around Devon were put up to protect the kids walking to school.  People in Chicago don’t know to stop at crosswalks (unlike in California), a sign that says they must is more likely to be obeyed.

      • rhoda

        How about a “Watch for Pedestrians” sign + brighter paint on the ground?

  • http://twitter.com/lakefrontmatt Matthew Puetz

    I detest crossing this intersection regardless of being a pedestrian, on bike or in a car.    I’m quick on my feet and can bolt (and frequently have to) to get across ahead of the nonstop stream of fast-moving traffic and it is usually scary.  I can’t imagine anyone unable to run or those with a stroller, grocery cart, wheelchair, etc. can manage to get across safely.  I’m 100% behind putting in an activated stoplight and will continue to contact the Alderman’s office until we get it.  Activated lights are used commonly on side streets throughout the suburbs, but are far less common in the city.  They only turn red for the major street if there is a car waiting to cross or a pedestrian presses the walk button, otherwise it would stay green all the time for Broadway traffic.  In addition, they also have technology available that is sensitive enough to change for a bicycle waiting at the corner.  Sadly, I agree now that there are some new businesses on the corner, it is just a matter of time before someone is killed.  Let’s be proactive for once and do something before there is another tragedy.  I can’t think of anywhere else in our area that a stoplight is needed more.   Lakewood Balmoral residents should be ashamed of themselves if they are only thinking about the handful of additional cars that may drive through over the cost of lives.  Last time I checked that area was not a private gated cul-de-sac in the suburbs.  If you want to make it into one let’s close off car access to Broadway at Balmoral from the West and put in a pedestrian/bike signal.  See how well that works out for you.  

  • katswig

    I hounded Alderman Smith for two years and always got the same response regarding the forthcoming traffic study and the cost issue – $250,000. A few weeks ago, my husband was chatting with someone at Burke’s and was told that a few weeks ago a child from the play lot ran out onto Broadway and came within six feet of being struck by a car. The witness marched down to the Alderman’s office and was told that a traffic light would cost $250,000. Does someone need to get killed for the street-light to be cost-effective? 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7RRQTQCSJ7PM54V6ATX2UMLEAM Florence Kennedy

    Smith spent enough money on that corner that we could have had 2 traffic signals.  She  built a custom designed playlot, much fancier than any other in Edgewater, because she lives two blocks away  Then she had the City buy the two story building next door to the playlot and demolish it.  Nothing ever got built there because she didn’t get to run again.  She used city money for what she wanted not what the neighborhood needs and that is why she would not have been re-elected.. 

  • Brian

    Shouldn’t parents be watching there kids in the playlot?  Doesn’t the playlot have a fence around it?  You people make it sound like the playlot has direct access to the street. I cross here regularly. If the traffic is busy I cross at Catalpa with the light.  All the traffic lights and stops in this city are crazy. They increase fuel consumption and make it very difficult to get around.

  • Rochell Richmond

    put up a stop sogn

  • Rochell Richmond

    put up a stop sign

  • Pingback: Work begins on Balmoral stop light | Edgeville Buzz

Become A Member: Get Email Updates
Become a member today, support your neighborhood news and stay in the loop. Members receive a special email update every week.

Member Me!