Quantcast

City’s bike sharing plan may not include Edgewater, initially

Wednesday, February 15, 2012
By Jeremy Bressman

Bike sharing bikes from bcycle at Daley Plaza. Credit: Flickr/ambimb

As you may know, the City of Chicago is in the process of installing a large scale bike sharing program across the city.  If you somehow missed that newsflash, check out this article from Grid Chicago.  The concept, similar to iGo, is designed to add another dimension to public transportation whereby a user can quickly hop on a “shared” bicycle for a shorter leg of their trip to/from their destination.  According to Wikipedia, there were approximately 300 such programs across the globe in 2011, in cities such as Paris, Boston, Washington DC, and coming to New York City this year.

While the city should be commended for taking the leap into the big leagues of bike sharing, one can’t help but wonder based on initial information if those of us in the northern-most (or southern-most) parts of the city will see the benefits of such a program.  Based on the RFP that was issued last Fall, the city is looking to install 300 stations by 2014, and no station will be more than 500 meters from each other.  According to the RFP, “Stations will be located approximately every 300 meters from the nearest station in most of the implementation zone, with stations located no greater than 500 meters from the nearest station in outlying areas or areas with lower demand. The City will be responsible for identifying the implementation zone, the locations and densities of stations, with input from the successful Respondent(s).”  You can read the entire  RFP here.

The initial implementation zone doesn’t seem like it will stretch further north than Belmont, according to Steven Vance, a blogger about sustainable transportation and urban planner.  ”This “implementation zone”, as I understood it from the pre-proposal conference was just a guide for the proposer to help them develop their proposal costs. It’s not set in stone and bike sharing locations could appear outside the implementation zone based on (1) the planning process (2) outside sponsorships and station donation. The zone is defined as the lakefront on the east, Belmont on the north, Ashland on the west, and 35th Street as the south border,” Vance stated in a recent post on Grid Chicago.

So, how can the city leave out Edgewater from this great project?  Edgewater is one of the most dense neighborhoods in the entire city, home of a large University, and comprised of many eco-friendly residents.  It would only make sense for the program to include our great neighborhood.

Tags: , , , ,

  • Allen Stryczek

    I delighted to hear that the city is moving aggressively to implement bike-sharing.  From an Edgewater Environmental Sustainability Project  (EESP) http://www.edgewater2020.org point of  view, it’s always great to keep Edgewater in the forefront of the urban planners’s minds when considering city-wide endeavors like this.    If we aren’t in the first wave, I hope that we’ll be a very closer follower. 

  • http://twitter.com/ArchiJake Jacob Peters

    This brings up the question: Is bike sharing seen by the city as a way of moving people in areas where there are a wide variety and density of short trips to many destinations? or does the DOT view it as a way of circulating residents about neighborhoods, serving as a collector for transit stations, as well as amenity to neighborhood business districts? Based on the current scale of the system proposed, I would guess the city is leaning towards the first definition, and are defining a large contiguous stretch of high density of residential, commercial and tourist activity.  A second phase could stretch out along the CTA lines to fulfill the second definition, possibly jumping to places like Hyde Park, Edgewater/Rogers Park, and Oak Park without serving pockets that are closer to the city center. 

Sign up for weekly email updates
Email
ZIP